10.13.08

Yamato 1/60 Destroid Tomahawk

Posted in 1/60, Destroids, Macross/Robotech TMS, Yamato at 7:46 pm by micronian

 Yamato Tomahawk 10.jpg

Review: The unsung heroes of Macross get their Toy Tribute

Tomahawk Box 1.jpgTomahawk Box 2.jpg

Packaging & Extras: (4/5)
I like Yamato’s newest series of 1/60 boxes (started with their VF-1 version 2.0). The artwork is attractive enough and features that collector’s style flip-top box. The extras here aren’t very remarkable but I can’t really figure out how much more they could have done. The toy comes with a 1/60 figure who looks to be directing an airplane and another figure who I suppose is a maintenance worker who is hunched over and pointing at something. Beyond that you get some brief instructions and lots of decals. I don’t handle decals personally but I read over at MacrossWorld that the decals included in both the version 2.0 VF-1 and this destroid are much improved from Yamato’s previous efforts.

Tomahawk Inserts 1.jpgYamato Tomahawk 1.jpg 

Charm & Collectability: (2.5/5)
Let’s be honest, there aren’t many fans of the destroids. In fact, I’m pretty surprised that they went with the destroids before doing the Glaug or Regult in 1/60 scale (and yes, I’m aware those would be bigger toys). You may have noticed that this is the first destroid toy ever reviewed on my site (gashapons excepted) so that ought to tell you how big a fan I am of these mechs. Don’t get me wrong, they’re cool enough in the series but I never saw much allure to playing with a toy of them… for the most part they just sat on the deck of the SDF-1 blowing up distant enemies or being destroyed by closer ones. There’s no transformation, just a tiny bit of metal, and while it is an excellent toy it may very well be destined for bargain bins some day.

 Yamato Tomahawk 4.jpgYamato Tomahawk 5.jpg

Sculpt, Detail, & Paint: (9/10)
When you first pull this toy from its box you’ll almost certainly be impressed. There are rivets in some panels, deep recesses in all the gun barrels, and plenty of fine detail to assure you that this is the finest crafted destroid ever made. I would have liked to have seen it a bit darker in color but that’s my only real complaint. I’m guessing that Yamato had a difficult time determining how much detail they should apply for the people buying these toys because there was never one Tomahawk that had hero markings. It would appear that Yamato elected to go light on tampo printed markings and instead supply you with a HUGE decal sheet so that you could make your destroid look however you prefer. Some people will love this, I’m a bit turned off by it since I never bother with decals.  Of all the destroids this was amongst my least favorite (I always thought it looked like a frog as a child and as an adult the gun arms seem like they wouldn’t function without being wildly inaccurate) but this toy is so nice that it has warmed me up to the design a bit.

 Yamato Tomahawk 6.jpgYamato Tomahawk 7.jpg

Design: (8.5/10)
I have only one gripe: I wish the upper body latched a bit more securely to the legs and waist. That’s not to say this toy falls apart constantly but there were a few times, while testing out the articulation, the upper body would become unlodged without my expecting or desiring it to. Beyond that there’s a lot to like here from all the opening doors revealing inner detail to the layout of all the joints. I’m penalizing this toy a tiny bit since there’s no transformation to it so its design can only be so remarkable.  It’s also worth noting that while Yamato left some tampo printing detail off for the benefit of customizer they also made this toy so that it can be largely disassembled.  The black arrows in the picture below point to various areas you can disconnect the toy (I may have missed some).

 Yamato Tomahawk 9A.jpgYamato Tomahawk 8.jpg

Durability & Build: (8.5/10)
My only question, at the moment, is: “how well will these joints put up with a lot of movement?” Over time I suspect this toy might get loose and, while it will always be a good looking destroid capable of holding some stoic poses, if it were to get loose that’d really hamper your ability to get into really aggressive poses. Some of the joints on the feet of my sample are already pretty fluid in their movement and it’d be nice if they were a bit tighter to help support the weight of the toy if in a severe lean or attempted running pose.  The waist also was fairly fluid on my sample, an observation I have seen in other reviews as well.  On the plus side, there’s metal in some of the joints due for more pressure and stress.

Yamato Tomahawk 2.jpgYamato Tomahawk 11.jpgYamato Tomahawk 3.jpg 

Articulation: (8/10)
This toy is right on that annoying cusp of being amazing to pose if you could just move this or tweak that a little bit more. As it is it’s still a ton of fun and far more articulated than I expected when I purchased it.

Tomahawk Comaprison 1.jpgTomahawk Comparison 2.jpg

Total Score: (40.5/50)
In the world of Macross toys we had to endure a lot of years with some really mediocre toys or rehashes of toys that were great over two decades ago. Fortunately we’re finally at a point where the products made for us are worth the time and effort to acquire. These destroids though are really going to make you struggle with whether or not they’re worth what Yamato is hoping to sell them for. I picked mine up through Overdrive and as you can see, Yamato is charging just about as much for these toys as they are for their remarkable VF-1 version 2.0 toys. So, congratulations diehard destroid fans, you’ve finally gotten a toy worth your long wait and I’m sure you won’t feel let down scooping them up at retail. For the rest of you, the VF-1 version 2.0 is really quite impressive so you might want to weigh your options.

13 Comments »

  1. Dennis said,

    October 14, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    Thanks for the great review! I had missed the preorder for Yamato 1/60 Destroid Tomahawk and it is now not easy to find this collectible sold at toy shops in Singapore. Can’t get any good offer on Ebay auction as well. I only have the old Matchbox version of Tomahawk.

    There are also news that the weathering version of Tomahawk would be released. Release of other destroids are also in the pipeline.

  2. fifbeat said,

    October 15, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    Great review. =)

  3. AcroRay said,

    October 15, 2008 at 5:23 pm

    Nice review! I agree the price point is a bit high for the product, but only because it contributes to make it more difficult for me to buy one!

    The Destroids have always been a favorite of mine. The Defender 1/72 kit was my channel into Macross from Gundam and Dougram, and their similarity to those other Real Type mecha I love so much have been one of my favorite parts of Macross.

    I think it looks like Yamato has done an incredible job here. The price point could be a bit lower, but these will be trying times globally for toymakers.

  4. Chris A said,

    October 24, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    Chalk me up as another destroid fan. Wonder if we’ll see a Yamato Monster?

  5. nt said,

    October 29, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    Well the closest one is the VB-6 Monster, I doubt they will be doing the destroid monster at 1/100 (that would be huuuugggeeee!)

  6. micronian said,

    October 29, 2008 at 9:04 pm

    Yamato had plans at one point to make a 1/60 MacII (it looked like a coffee table). They brought it to at least one trade show in Japan. It’ll be interesting to see if they revisit the idea with all these other 1/60 destroids being released.

  7. vladykins said,

    November 14, 2008 at 4:12 pm

    Excellent review as always. Just received mine in the mail and am quite happy- it is maybe an inch of two taller than the old Macross Excalibur/Tomahawk and loads more articulate.

    My one gripe is that the missile pods on the legs are not functional– I expected since they had a version on the valk armor that they would just replicate it here, but instead it’s just removable boxes.

    All in all, a nice hefty piece if you are looking for a destroid (and if they release a black and red version, they will appeal strongly to old school Battletech fans as well).

  8. micronian said,

    November 14, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    I may be mistaken but I believe those boxes on the hips are actually heat sinks.

  9. vladykins said,

    November 21, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    Hmmm– maybe I’m remembering the RPG rather than the original line art, but I recall them being missile launchers like on the sumo armor. They do have the same shape and markings ars the hip/leg missile pods on the sumo armor (just compared the Yamato GBP armor to the boxes on the Yamato Tomahawk and the Matchbox Excalibur and, while the boxes are smaller, they have the same markings).

    I’ll see if I can find line art to go with this rather than base it on memory.

  10. MisterRyno said,

    November 29, 2008 at 1:07 am

    Nice review mate. I’m trying to figure out why I have not gotten around to reading it till now. If/Once this bad boy hits the lower price point it is actually worthy of then I will pick one up. And the rest of the Destroids once they are released. I am very happy with Yamatos new 1/60 scale thuse far (the VF-1s and the Destroids). Let’s just see if they can further impress me. Keep up the GREAT reviews. I love reading them…sometimes you help me make up my mind on what I really want.

    N I N J A

  11. SeniorBiscuit said,

    April 4, 2009 at 10:21 pm

    Good review, though I agree the price seems a bit much.

    In the charm and collectability section though, what you overlook is that alot of Destroid fans are actually Battletech fans, as the destroids were scooped up as early mech designs. Those since became ‘unseen’ and any reproduction of these classic Battlemechs are sought after by Battletech collectors.

  12. koonfasa said,

    May 15, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    The warhammer and crusader are my favourites. Now I get to build a 1/60 lance.
    All I need is the battlemaster and wolverine…

  13. DARKWIND said,

    March 19, 2010 at 2:27 am

    Again you rock!
    You helped make up my mind on this too bro, good review.

Leave a Comment